Value for Money Assessment

Quantified Value for Money Assessment AI-Optimized Health Supply Chain Framework - Uganda Pilot Implementation

Version 1.0 | November 2025


Document Information

Field
Value

Project

Optimizing Aid Supply Chain with Local Insights in Uganda

Lead Organization

International Foundation for Recovery and Development (IFRAD)

Funding Source

Elrha Humanitarian Innovation Fund (UK FCDO)

Status

Phase 1 Complete - Awaiting MOH/NMS Financial Data for Phase 2

Next Version

Version 2.0 (with quantified calculations) expected May 2026


Executive Summary

This document provides the quantified value for money (VfM) assessment framework for the offline-first AI supply chain optimization system piloted across 10 health facilities in Karamoja and Southwestern Uganda.

The assessment follows the 4E Model:

  • Economy (Spending Less)

  • Efficiency (Spending Well)

  • Effectiveness (Spending Wisely)

  • Equity (Spending Fairly)

Data Availability Status

The baseline assessment captured operational performance metrics but encountered significant financial data gaps:

Data Type
Status

Budget utilization

Unavailable for 5 of 10 facilities

Commodity expiry costs

Not tracked at facility level

Emergency delivery costs

District level only, no facility breakdown

Health worker wages

Held centrally by MOH

This Document Provides

  • Complete VfM calculation methodology with worked formulas

  • Verified baseline operational metrics from pilot facilities

  • Clearly marked placeholders for MOH/NMS financial data

  • Data collection guide for government partners

  • Sensitivity analysis framework for scenario modeling


Key Findings from Available Data

Baseline operational metrics demonstrate substantial improvement potential:

Finding
Value

Facilities experiencing stockouts

100% (10 of 10)

Average stockout duration (remote facilities)

Up to 120 days (Nakivale)

Connectivity reliability

Unreliable at 89% of facilities

Storage capacity-stockout correlation

r = -0.695 (strong negative)

Emergency procurement frequency

Quarterly to monthly at HC III facilities


Baseline Performance Data

Data collected from 10 pilot facilities (2 regional referral hospitals, 8 spoke health centers) across four districts: Moroto, Amudat, Mbarara, and Isingiro.

Data Collection Period: August 25 - September 6, 2025 Source: IFRAD Baseline Assessment Report (October 2025), 33 quantitative surveys, 31 key informant interviews


Projected Improvements

Based on the offline-first AI framework design with three-tier forecasting architecture:

Performance Area
Target Improvement
Source

Stockout duration reduction

40% reduction

Needs Assessment Report Dec 2024

Delivery delay reduction

30% reduction (rainy season)

Needs Assessment Report Dec 2024

Forecast accuracy (Tiers 2-3)

≥85% prediction accuracy

Needs Assessment Report Dec 2024

Ordering cycle time

From 2 weeks to 2 days

Technical Validation Report

Equity target

≤5% accuracy disparity urban/rural

Needs Assessment Report Dec 2024


Financial ROI Calculation

Financial ROI measures cash-releasable savings through reduced waste (expired commodities) and avoided emergency logistics costs.

Formula

Variable Definitions and Data Status

Variable
Definition
Data Source/Status

Expiry Savings

(Baseline Expiry Rate - Current Rate) × Unit Cost × Annual Volume

MOH/NMS REQUIRED

Logistics Savings

(Baseline Emergency Runs - Current Runs) × Cost per Run

MOH/NMS REQUIRED

Operating Cost

Annual server hosting + maintenance + technical support

PROJECT DATA: £50,000 GBP

Worked Example

Component
Value (UGX)

Baseline annual expiries (value)

[PLACEHOLDER - MOH/NMS DATA]

Projected expiries with AI (40% reduction)

[AUTO-CALCULATED]

Expiry Savings

[AUTO-CALCULATED]

Baseline emergency runs/year

[PLACEHOLDER - MOH/NMS DATA]

Cost per emergency run

[PLACEHOLDER - MOH/NMS DATA]

Logistics Savings

[AUTO-CALCULATED]

Annual operating cost

[UGX equivalent of £50,000]

FINANCIAL ROI

[CALCULATED UPON DATA INPUT]


Social Return on Investment (SROI)

SROI monetizes efficiency gains by valuing staff time freed from manual ordering processes.

Formula

Time Calculation Basis

Metric
Current
With AI System
Savings

Time per ordering cycle

2 weeks (80 hrs)

2 days (16 hrs)

64 hours

Rationale: Staff currently spend ~1 week collecting data from paper records, preparing orders, and entering into multiple systems (DHIS2, eAFYA, CSSP). AI system reduces this to 2 days for data review and order approval only.

Worked Example (10 Pilot Facilities)

Component
Value

Hours saved per ordering cycle

64 hours

Ordering cycles per facility per year

[PLACEHOLDER - assume 12]

Number of pilot facilities

10

Total hours saved annually

64 × 12 × 10 = 7,680 hours

Average hourly wage (UGX)

[PLACEHOLDER - MOH PAYROLL]

SROI (Monetized Time Value)

[CALCULATED UPON DATA INPUT]

circle-info

Interpretation: This monetized value represents health system efficiency gains. Staff can redirect freed time to direct patient care.

This is classified as 'time-releasable' rather than 'cash-releasable' value.


Data Collection Guide for MOH/NMS

National Medical Stores (NMS) Data Requirements

Data Element
Specification
Collection Method

Commodity Expiry Value

Total UGX value of expired medicines at 10 pilot facilities (Aug 2024 - Aug 2025)

NMS invoices matched to facility expiry reports

Top 10 Expired Commodities

Most frequently expired items with unit costs

NMS procurement database

Emergency Delivery Costs

Average cost per emergency delivery (fuel, per diem, vehicle)

District fuel logs and vehicle manifests

Ministry of Health Data Requirements

Data Element
Specification
Collection Method

Health Worker Wages

Average gross hourly wage for pharmacists/clinical officers in ordering

MOH payroll (annual salary / 2,080 hours)

Ordering Cycle Frequency

Number of ordering cycles per facility per year

District procurement schedules

System Operating Costs

Annual hosting, maintenance, support in UGX

MOH budget office

Data Validation Protocol

  1. Verify expiry data against facility-level stock cards (avoid double-counting)

  2. Cross-reference emergency delivery costs against district fuel logs

  3. Calculate blended hourly wage including benefits

  4. Document assumptions for any estimated values

  5. Use Bank of Uganda midpoint exchange rate (Dec 31, 2025) for GBP→UGX

  6. Obtain district health office sign-off before finalizing


Sensitivity Analysis Framework

Given uncertainty in baseline financial data, sensitivity analysis models how VfM outcomes vary under different scenarios.

Key Variables for Scenario Modeling

Variable
Conservative
Optimistic

Stockout reduction

20%

50%

Expiry reduction

15%

40%

Emergency delivery reduction

20% fewer

40% fewer

Time savings per cycle

40 hours

80 hours

Break-Even Analysis

A neutral Financial ROI (0%) indicates the system pays for itself through waste reduction without generating additional cash savings.


Glossary

Term
Definition

4E Model

Framework: Economy (spending less), Efficiency (spending well), Effectiveness (spending wisely), Equity (spending fairly)

Cash-releasable

Savings that could be returned to budget (e.g., reduced expiries, fuel costs)

Time-releasable

Staff time freed from admin tasks, redirected to patient care

MAPE

Mean Absolute Percentage Error - forecast accuracy metric

Offline-first

Systems function fully without internet, syncing when available

Three-tier forecasting

Tier 1: Rule-based (offline), Tier 2: Statistical (intermittent), Tier 3: ML (district/central)

Tracer commodities

Key essential medicines monitored for stockout tracking


Document Information

Field
Value

Version

1.0 (Methodology Complete)

Date

November 2025

Author

IFRAD

Audience

Elrha HIF Program, Uganda MOH, NMS, District Health Offices

Last updated